Learn Mineral Title LearnMineral Title ← All topics
Topics/Conveyancing & Deeds

Topic 02 · Conveyancing

Conveyancing & Deeds

Every severance and every transfer starts with a deed. 

⏱ ~14 min readPlain English, as promisedUpdated Jun 2026

The document itself

Anatomy of a deed

A deed is a legal document that transfers land.

Strip away the formal, legal writing and a deed generally says one thing: "I, the grantor, give this property to you, the grantee." Everything else answers four questions: who is giving, who is receiving, what exactly is moving, and on what terms.

Deeds follow a common script that is easy once you learn it. 

Captionwhat kind of deed WARRANTY DEED
Parties & recitalswho, and for what That John Doe ("Grantor"), for ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration paid by Jane Roe ("Grantee")
Granting clausethe action words …has GRANTED, SOLD, and CONVEYED, and by these presents does grant, sell, and convey, unto Grantee…
Descriptionwhat land …the following described property: the NW/4 of Section 14, Township 3 North, Range 2 West
Reservations & exceptionswhat's NOT moving SAVE AND EXCEPT, and Grantor reserves unto himself an undivided one-half (1/2) of the oil, gas, and other minerals
Habendumhow long they keep it TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises unto Grantee, her heirs and assigns, forever.
Warrantythe grantor's promise …and Grantor binds himself to WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the premises against every person lawfully claiming the same…
Executionmaking it official Signed by Grantor, acknowledged before a notary, and filed with the county records.
Fig. 1 A deed can be split into its common parts.

A title reader spends 90% of the time on three of these: the granting clause (what's moving), the description (which land), and the reservations and exceptions (what's being held back). Those three are where ownership actually changes shape.

The engine room

The granting clause & habendum

The granting clause is the sentence that does the work. "Grant, bargain, sell, and convey" . . . Whatever interest the deed transfers, this clause is what transfers it.

The habendum clause, "to have and to hold," answers a different question: what kind of estate does the grantee take, and for how long? "Unto Grantee, her heirs and assigns, forever" is the classic formula for fee simple: yours, permanently, and inheritable.

Key term
Habendum clause

The "to have and to hold" clause, defining the duration and extent of the estate granted. In deeds it usually confirms fee simple. You'll meet it again in oil & gas leases, where the habendum is the star of the show, defining the primary and secondary term.

Most of the time the granting clause and habendum agree, and you read right past them. The trouble starts when a deed's clauses conflict: the granting clause says one fraction, a later clause says another. Courts have spent decades on rules for harmonizing inconsistent deeds, and approaches differ. The practical lesson for an examiner:

  • Read the whole deed, every time. Never stop at the granting clause and assume the rest is boilerplate.
  • Flag internal conflicts instead of resolving them in your head, because inconsistent fractions in a deed are a classic source of title disputes.

"Boilerplate is just a clause you haven't been burned by yet."

The fork in the road

Reservations vs. exceptions

Here's where deeds quietly sever mineral estates.  Two tools let a grantor hold something back, and they are not the same:

Reservation
The grantor keeps something out of what's conveyed.

A reservation creates (or retains) a right in the grantor. Convey the land, reserve the minerals, and the grantor walks away still owning what's below. This is the classic severance move.

"Grantor reserves unto himself an undivided 1/2 of the oil, gas, and other minerals."
Exception
Something is carved out of the conveyance entirely.

An exception says "this part isn't included," often because it already belongs to someone else (a prior reservation, an easement, an outstanding mineral interest). The exception doesn't create anything new; it just keeps the deed honest.

"SAVE AND EXCEPT the 1/4 mineral interest previously reserved in Volume 89, Page 412."
Fig. 2 Reservation: grantor keeps it. Exception: it was never on the table.

Why care about the difference? Because the question an examiner constantly answers is "where did this outstanding interest come from?" A reservation tells you an interest was born in that deed. An exception tells you to look further back somewhere up the chain, someone already owns that piece.

!

Drafters mix these words up constantly: you'll see "excepting and reserving" mashed together as a single incantation. Courts generally look at what the parties meant, not which label they used. Read the substance, not just the word.

What's actually moving

Mineral deeds & royalty deeds

Once minerals are severed, they get bought and sold like anything else.  A mineral deed can convey the minerals, but watch out for royalty deeds. 

Mineral deed
conveys the estate itself
Develop
Lease (executive right)
Bonus
Delay rentals
Royalty
▸ grantee can sign leases, collect bonus, and shares in royalty
Royalty deed
conveys a share of production revenue only
Develop
Lease (executive right)
Bonus
Delay rentals
Royalty
▸ grantee gets paid when there's production, and that's it
Fig. 3 Same five sticks from Topic 01: a mineral deed moves the bundle; a royalty deed moves one stick.

A mineral deed conveys the mineral estate.   The grantee becomes a mineral owner: they can lease, collect bonus, and receive royalty.

A royalty deed conveys only the right to share in production revenue. The grantee gets a check when a well produces, but no say in leasing and no bonus. 

The infamous problem: deeds that blur the line. A grantor conveys "an undivided 1/16 royalty in and to the minerals." Is that a royalty interest, or a fractional mineral interest? Whole shelves of case law exist because drafters used "mineral" and "royalty" interchangeably. The two interests can differ in value enormously, so the construction matters.

!

For now, just learn the smell. When a deed mixes "mineral" and "royalty" language, slow down.  How this is resolved depends on the jurisdiction. 

Making it stick

Recording & constructive notice

Here's a fact that surprises everyone: an unrecorded deed is still valid between the grantor and grantee. Recording is what makes it valid against other parties. It's what makes it safe.

Every county keeps public land records. When you record a deed there, the world is treated as knowing about it.  That's constructive notice. Nobody can later buy the same land and claim they had no way of knowing about your deed. The records were the way of knowing.

Why it matters, the classic double-sale:

Day 1 Owen deeds his minerals to Anna. Anna tucks the deed in a drawer. She does not record it.
Day 30 Owen, being a scoundrel, deeds the same minerals to Ben. Ben pays real money, has no idea Anna exists, and checks the records: nothing there.
Day 31 Ben records his deed. Anna finally records hers on Day 40. Oops, too late.
In most states, Ben wins. He paid value, had no notice of Anna's deed, and recorded first. Anna's unrecorded deed was valid against Owen but not against an innocent purchaser who relied on a clean record. Moral: record immediately.
Fig. 5 The double-sale problem is the whole reason recording acts exist.
Key term
Bona fide purchaser

Someone who buys an interest for value, in good faith, without notice (actual or constructive) of a competing claim. Recording acts generally protect the bona fide purchaser over the earlier buyer who failed to record.

!

The flavor of recording act varies by state: "race," "notice," and "race-notice" systems allocate the loss a little differently in edge cases. The everyday lesson is identical everywhere: the records rule.

And this, finally, is why title examination works at all. Because everyone is on constructive notice of the records, the records are a complete (if messy) history of ownership. A chain of title is just that history, read in order.  That's exactly what we will continue to learn here.

Test yourself

Quick gut-check

Three quick ones. Think first, then tap to check yourself: no score, no login, nobody watching.

1A deed conveys a tract "SAVE AND EXCEPT the 1/2 mineral interest reserved in a 1965 deed." Did this deed just sever the minerals?
No: that's an exception, not a reservation. The severance happened back in 1965; this deed is just acknowledging it. Your job as an examiner: go find that 1965 deed and follow where that 1/2 interest went.
2Dana receives a deed conveying "an undivided 1/4 of the oil, gas, and other minerals." Can Dana sign an oil & gas lease for her interest?
Yes. That's mineral-interest language: Dana took a fraction of the whole bundle, including the executive right. If the deed had conveyed "an undivided 1/4 royalty," she'd get paid on production but have no power to lease.
3True or false: an unrecorded mineral deed is void.
False. It's perfectly valid between grantor and grantee, ONLY.  But a later bona fide purchaser who checks the records, sees nothing, and records first can generally defeat it. Recording is armor, not a birth certificate.
← Back to all topics